Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Correction to: Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude

Movement Ecology volume 9, Article number: 51 (2021) Cite this article

The Original Article was published on 13 June 2021

Correction to: Movement Ecology (2021) 9:32 https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-021-00267-5

Following publication of the original article [1], errors were identified in the presentation of some of the reference citations in the Background section (page 2 of the PDF) and the Conclusion section (page 10 of the PDF) due to a typesetting mistake.

These errors have been corrected and the original article has been updated. The publisher apologises to the authors and readers for the inconvenience caused by this mistake.

Reference

  1. Galtbalt, et al. Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude. Mov Ecol. 2021;9:32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-021-00267-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia

    Batbayar Galtbalt & Marcel Klaassen

  2. Threatened Species Recovery Hub, National Environment Science Program, Research Institute for Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, Northern Territory, 0909, Australia

    Amanda Lilleyman & Stephen T. Garnett

  3. Queensland Wader Study Group, 22 Parker Street, Shailer Park, 4128, Australia

    Jonathan T. Coleman

  4. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Institute of Biodiversity Science, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China

    Chuyu Cheng & Zhijun Ma

  5. Department of Environment, Water, Land and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute, PO Box 137, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia

    Danny I. Rogers

  6. Australasian Wader Studies Group, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Danny I. Rogers

  7. School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Bradley K. Woodworth & Richard A. Fuller

  8. Victorian Wader Study Group, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Marcel Klaassen

Authors
  1. Batbayar Galtbalt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda Lilleyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan T. Coleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chuyu Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhijun Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Danny I. Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bradley K. Woodworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Richard A. Fuller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Stephen T. Garnett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Marcel Klaassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Batbayar Galtbalt.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galtbalt, B., Lilleyman, A., Coleman, J.T. et al. Correction to: Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude. Mov Ecol 9, 51 (2021). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-021-00289-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-021-00289-z

Movement Ecology

ISSN: 2051-3933