Skip to main content

Age-related differences in fall migration timing and performance of juvenile and adult Wood Thrushes departing from a breeding site

Abstract

Juvenile passerines are expected to have lower migration performance than adults due to their inexperience with long-distance flights and morphological limitations, such as shorter wing length. From 2016 to 2019 we radio-tagged nestling and adult Wood Thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) at a breeding site in southwestern Ontario and used the automated Motus Wildlife Tracking System to test if age class predicts timing of the onset of fall migration (date, time of night), flight speed during the initial migration flight across Lake Erie, and overall pace of migration southward through the eastern United States. We detected 60/117 (51%) adults and 82/119 (69%) juveniles departing the breeding area as they initiated fall migration. Compared with adults, juveniles departed at an earlier date in fall and later time in the evening. When crossing Lake Erie on their first migratory flight juveniles travelled about 25% slower than adults but this was due primarily to adults making better use of tailwinds. When travelling south through the eastern U.S. juveniles had a slower overall migration pace (47.3 ± 5.1km/day) than adults (71.6 ± 4.7km/day). Although we found evidence that juvenile Wood Thrushes have an earlier and slower fall migration than adults, identifying the proximate and ultimate mechanisms remains a challenge. There is no evidence that juvenile Wood Thrushes are inefficient in migration flight or refueling at stopovers, and it is unlikely that the fall migration pace in this species affects their ability to compete for wintering food resources. More tracking studies from breeding sites are needed to understand the ecological factors favouring and biological significance of, age-related differences in migration performance.

Introduction

Every fall, Neotropical-Nearctic migratory songbirds must travel from their temperate breeding grounds to the tropics and juveniles complete this journey for the first time by using information that has been innately programmed (reviewed by Akesson et al. [1], Justen et al. [35]). This long-distance migration imposes extreme physiological demands on individuals who undergo multi-hour flights followed by multi-day stopovers to refuel [72]. Migration is the most dangerous portion of the annual cycle (e.g. Sillett and Holmes [60]) and as such, it is expected to be under high selection pressure [3]. Optimal migration theory hypothesizes that minimizing time spent on migration is important, but this must be balanced with minimizing both energy cost and predation risk (Hedenstrom [30]). Adults that have already successfully migrated at least once learn routes, stopover sites, final destinations and can make navigational adjustments on successive journeys or after experimental displacement (e.g. Thorup et al. [69]). Thus, adults are expected to have better migration performance than juveniles (e.g., timing of departure, orientation, pace, use of wind assistance; Mitchell et al. [43], reviewed by Akesson et al. [1]). Juvenile birds also have physiological factors that can limit migration performance such as shorter wings [2, 39, 49], larger digestive organs, and smaller flight muscles [32, 38]. Ideal tests of superior migration performance in adults would be longitudinal to show that individuals improve their migration performance as they age [59]. However, repeat tracking is difficult in passerines because juveniles that depart from their natal site on fall migration are rarely encountered again and the battery life of appropriately sized remote tracking devices is not sufficient to gather migration data over multiple years for most species.

Tests of the hypothesis that adult passerines have better migration performance than juveniles have often relied on banding and tracking studies at stopover sites. Schmaljohann et al. [57] found that juveniles departed a stopover site later in the night than adults during fall migration but not spring migration. Several studies have found that during fall migration juveniles spend more time at stopover sites than adults (e.g. Yong et al. [73]; Collet and Heim [16]) which could be due to less efficient refueling and thus cause a slower migration pace. However, body mass gain during fall stopover is not necessarily slower for juveniles (e.g. Rguibi-Idrissi et al. [55], Seewagen et al. [58]). At a Gulf Coast stopover, prior to crossing the Gulf of Mexico in fall, juvenile Swainson’s Thrushes (Catharus ustulatus) did not have longer stopovers or depart in a different direction than experienced adults (Smolinsky et al. [62]). Interpretation of such results from stopover studies may be complicated by the different breeding/natal site origins of individuals captured at stopover sites and thus differences in time elapsed since migration departure, distance covered, and different environmental conditions encountered along the way. Juveniles at a stopover site far from their natal site may also have already gained sufficient migration experience to keep pace with adults.

A powerful test of the hypothesis that adults will have better performance is to compare migration parameters for adults and juveniles that begin their migration from the same site. McKinnon et al. [39] deployed geolocators on juvenile and adult Wood Thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) at a wintering site in Belize and found that juveniles started their first spring migration about one week later than adults and had a slower pace of spring migration due to more frequent stops as they moved northward through the U.S. after crossing the Gulf of Mexico. However, geolocators are generally not useful for tracking fall migration of juvenile passerines from natal sites because most individuals are never seen again, and so archival data cannot be retrieved. It is possible however, to remotely track juveniles from their natal site using the automated Motus Wildlife Tracking System (Motus), and either by tagging birds on island breeding populations (e.g. Mitchell et al. [43], Crysler et al. [20]) or by deploying radio-tags on adults and nestlings on the breeding territories months before fall migration begins (e.g. Horn et al. [31], Hayes et al. [28, 29]). Studies on the Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis) found that juveniles started fall migration 3–4 weeks earlier than adults ([20, 31]). Mitchell et al. [42] found that juvenile Savannah Sparrows leaving Kent Island, New Brunswick, on their first migration flight took longer to cover the same distance across the ocean as adults but this was a result of juveniles departing under less ideal wind conditions rather than reduced flight performance. Juvenile Savannah Sparrows departing their natal sites on Sable Island, 100 km offshore from Nova Scotia, chose shorter overwater crossings than adults, perhaps to reduce the mortality risk during their first migratory flight [20].

The Wood Thrush is a relatively large (~ 50 g) forest songbird that is a long-distance migrant which has been declining throughout most of its range (e.g. Taylor and Stutchbury [67]). Geolocator tracking has shown that Wood Thrushes from this breeding region primarily winter in eastern Central America [63]. We used Motus in eastern North America to detect migrating juvenile and adult Wood Thrushes that had been radio-tagged on their natal/breeding territories in southwestern Ontario. To evaluate the hypothesis that adults have better migratory performance than juveniles, we compared the date of fall migration departure for adults versus juveniles, and tested if adults departed sooner after sunset, had greater flight speed of the first migratory flight, and a higher overall migration pace south through the eastern U.S. compared to juveniles. To compare flight speed for juveniles versus adults we used the first stage of migration which was the ~ 60 km crossing of Lake Erie where birds were detected departing from the north shore and arriving on the south shore the same night, allowing us to estimate flight speed of the first migratory flight. To compare the overall migration pace for juvenile and adult birds we measured the period of time that elapsed between detections for birds that were detected at multiple towers while migrating south through the eastern United States.

Methods

Study area

This study was conducted in Norfolk County, southwestern Ontario (42.6914 °N, 80.4877 °W), Canada (Fig. 1), which lies on the north shore of Lake Erie and has 21% forest cover that is composed of a wide variety of deciduous and mixed forest fragments of varying sizes [37]. Norfolk County has the most extensive Motus coverage in Ontario, with 13 towers resulting in a projected near-complete coverage for birds in migratory flight. During May–August from 2016 to 2019, nestling and adult Wood Thrushes were tagged in a total of 29 different forest fragments (16–499 ha in size) on a mix of public and private land that had similar forest structure and assemblages of dominant species of shrubs and trees [10, 28]. Dominant tree species consisted of maples (Acer spp.), oaks (Quercus spp.), White Pine (Picea glauca), American Beech (Fagus grandifolia), and Yellow Birch (Betula alleghaniensis), while dominant shrub species consisted of Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), Mapleleaf Viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), American Witch-hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), Beaked Hazelnut (Corylus cornuta), and Chokecherry (Prunus virginiana). Necessary permits were obtained from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Nature Conservancy Canada, Long Point Region Conservation Authority, and Long Point Basin Land Trust for conducting research on public lands, and landowner permission was sought during each spring for access to private lands.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the study area located in Norfolk County, Ontario, where adult and juvenile Wood Thrushes were tagged at 25 sites during the 2016–2019 breeding seasons

2.2 Study species

Wood Thrushes are large-bodied enough to carry a radio transmitter with a year-long battery life, and previous studies found no negative effects of radio transmitters on survival and behavior [24]. Wood Thrushes have been previously tracked year-round using similarly-sized archival light level geolocators [63, 65, 66]. Their nests are often easy to find and monitor and many females produce multiple broods [26]. Wood Thrushes are a federally listed Threatened Species at Risk in Canada but are still a common breeding species in the deciduous and mixed forest fragments of southwestern Ontario [18]. In recent decades Wood Thrushes have declined across most of their breeding range due to habitat loss and fragmentation (e.g. Taylor and Stutchbury [67]).

Nest searching, monitoring, and radio-tagging

Beginning on May 15 each year, all the study sites were searched for nests starting at the location of each singing male. Nests were checked every 6–8 days using a cellphone attached to a pole to record a video of the nest contents that could be reviewed away from the nest. When nestlings were observed, age was estimated by assessing feather growth. When nestlings were 10 days old, shortly before fledging which occurs at 12–14 days, they were removed from the nest and banded with both Canadian Wildlife Service numbered aluminum bands and unique color band combinations. The largest nestling (by mass) had a blood sample (< 25 uL) taken for genetic sexing (HealthGene Molecular Diagnostic and Research Center, Concord, Canada) and was equipped with a uniquely coded radio transmitter using a backpack leg loop harness [53] made from 2.5 mm Teflon tubing. Only one nestling was tagged at most nests (82%; 131 of 160 nests) but two nestlings were tagged at 29 nests that fledged late in the season. Of all tagged nestlings (n = 189), 133 survived to 16 days post-fledging and 119 survived to the onset of fall migration [28]. We refer to this age class as juvenile (e.g. Mitchell et al. [42], Patchett et al. [50]), although other studies on age-related migration timing use the terms hatch year [12, 14] or young [45].

Adults were caught by placing mist nets in the vicinity of nests and then banded with both Canadian Wildlife Service numbered aluminum bands and unique color band combinations. As with the nestlings, breeding adults (n = 117; 32 male and 85 female) were equipped with a uniquely coded radio transmitter using a backpack leg loop harness [53] made from 2.5 mm Teflon tubing. Sex was determined by checking for the presence of a brood patch or cloacal protuberance and age was determined as either second year (i.e., first breeding season) or after second year using plumage criteria [51].

The specifications of the radio-tags varied among years (2016: NTQBW-6-1 (1.6 g); 2017: ANTC-M6-1 (1.7 g); 2018: ANTC-M6-1 and NTQB2-6-1 (1.6 g); 2019: NTQB2-4-2S (1.5 g)) due to the manufacturer (Lotek Wireless Inc., Newmarket, Canada) discontinuing models, but all had similar performance, a burst rate of 12.7 s, and minimum expected lifespan of 400 days.

Motus migration detections

The Motus Wildlife Tracking System is an automated radio telemetry system that is able to detect radio-tags remotely and thereby record individual bird movement over a regional scale with high temporal resolution, making it ideal for this type of study [68]. Each Motus Nanotag transmits a unique coded signal on the same frequency, so a single receiver is capable of detecting all tags in the network [68]. Using Motus eliminates one of the main problems associated with archival GPS and light-level geolocators: the need to recover the tags to retrieve the data. With Motus, the timing of onset of fall migration can be determined precisely, even for birds that are never seen again. Motus can also determine onset of fall migration when it occurs in mid-late September whereas light-level geolocators do not accurately estimate latitude for movements that occur close to the autumn equinox [11, 65].

Motus receivers sometimes record false detections due to random radio noise, duplicate tags, and overlapping tag signals when multiple tags are transmitting in the same area [19]. A number of filtering and quality control steps were taken to identify these and exclude them from analysis. First, we eliminated detections of fewer than 3 consecutive tag bursts because they are likely to be false detections [19]. Next, we eliminated any detection that occurred in impossible locations based on prior knowledge of migration timing and routes from geolocator studies [63, 65].

Detections representing the initiation of fall migration were those that occurred after sunset during the migratory period (August 25–October 15), when a bird was not detected in Ontario again until the following year. We used the time stamp of the first detection on the migration date to represent the time of day of the start of migration. Because the timing of sunset (the moment the sun disappears below the horizon) varies greatly during the migratory period, we calculated the number of minutes after sunset each bird began its migration at and used this number as our response variable. Motus towers cannot determine when a bird actually begins a migratory flight, only when it is first detected near the origin site. For this reason, we removed one extreme outlier from analysis, an adult that was detected 84 min later than the next latest bird, more than 5 h after sunset.

Our study area lies on the north shore of Lake Erie which gave us the unique opportunity to estimate flight speed of the initial migratory flight of birds that were detected departing the study area and subsequently detected along the south shore of Lake Erie. We cannot assume that the movements between stations are linear, but we can be reasonably certain that birds did not land in the water between detection at these towers. Signal strength readings when a bird flies past a tower create a parabolic arc with increasing strength heading toward the tower and decreasing strength after passing the tower. Because there is variation in the range at which a tower can detect a bird, we calculated the amount of time it took a bird to fly from peak signal strength at the last tower on the north shore of Lake Erie to the peak signal strength at the first tower on the south shore of Lake Erie [8], Additional Fig. 1). We measured the distance between the two towers and using the time elapsed between peak detections, calculated the average flight speed (km/h) and used this as our response variable. Some birds were detected before and after crossing Lake Erie, but were not picked up by one or both towers long enough to show the expected rising and falling of signal strength. These individuals (n = 11 adults; 8 juveniles) were removed from analysis because without a clear peak in signal strength, we could not accurately estimate the time when they passed each tower.

The direction and speed of wind was found to be an important predictor of migratory flight speed [43] so we included it as a covariate in our flight speed models. Following the methods of Morbey et al. [44], we used the RNCEP package [36] in R to extract easterly (90°) and northerly (0°) wind components at the 925 mb pressure level, which corresponds to an altitude of 675–825 m over Lake Erie and is comparable to the altitude of migratory flights measured in other species of thrushes [9]. We used linear interpolation with the NCEP.interpol function to interpolate 925 mb wind conditions at the time and date of departure for each bird. To estimate the tailwind component, we used Vw × cos(β), where Vw is the wind speed and β is the difference between the flight bearing and wind direction [56]. We assumed a flight bearing of 180°, as most birds were detected almost directly south of the study area after crossing the lake. This resulted in a tailwind metric that ranged from about − 10 when flying directly into a strong headwind, to about 10 when benefitting from a strong and direct tailwind.

The last measure we examined was the pace of migration through the U.S. after the night of the initial migratory flight. Motus does not allow us to determine when a bird is stopping over (e.g., relatively stationary for one or more nights) versus migrating because of gaps in tower coverage, but we can measure the time it takes a bird to travel between towers and measure the distance between those towers to calculate the average number of kilometers a bird travels per day. If a bird is spending more time stopping over, it will travel fewer kilometers per day when covering the distance between towers. To ensure that we were measuring stopover behavior and not speed of direct overnight flights, we eliminated detections that occurred on consecutive days (n = 2). We detected 25 individuals at multiple towers, not on successive days, as they migrated south through the United States (Additional Fig. 2). In Swainson’s Thrushes (Catharus ustulatus) migration pace was found to be slower at higher latitudes [8], so we calculated the midpoint in latitude between Motus towers to include as a variable in analysis. We also included the distance between Motus towers because it was also found to be important to predicting migration pace in Swainson’s Thrushes, with a faster pace when detections were geographically closer to each other [8].

Fig. 2
figure 2

During 2016–2019, juvenile Wood Thrushes tagged in southwestern Ontario averaged earlier fall migration departure dates than adults (A), and the time of night they initiated migration was later than adults (B). Juvenile Wood Thrushes averaged a slower flight speed on their first migratory flight (C), and migration pace southward through the eastern U.S. was also slower than adults (D)

Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted in R 4.3.2 [52] and all tests were two-tailed and values are expressed as means ± SE. All scatterplots were created using the ggplot2 package [71] in R. We used the dredge function in the MuMIn package [6] to rank candidate models using Akaike Information Criterion scores corrected for small sample size (AICc). We considered models to be supported when their ΔAICc = 0–2 (the top model ΔAICc = 0) and at least 2 AICc better than the intercept-only model [13], but examined each supported model to avoid assigning importance to uninformative parameters [5]. To evaluate predictor variables in each supported set of models, we used model averaging and calculated 95% confidence intervals. For linear models we examined residual plots to check model assumptions and for generalized linear models we used the DHARMa package [27] to standardize residuals and plot them against rank-transformed model predictions to check model assumptions.

To test whether fall migration initiation date, flight speed, and migration pace differed between adult and juvenile Wood Thrushes, we fit linear models using age (adult or juvenile) as our predictor and included the covariates sex and year using the stats package (R Core Team [52]). For our fall migration initiation date analysis, we also included an interaction between age and sex because adult female Wood Thrushes initiate fall migration an average of five days earlier than males [10], while juvenile female Wood Thrushes average only slightly earlier migration initiation than males [28]. For our migration pace analysis, we used linear mixed models and included individual as a random effect using the R package lme4 [7] to account for some individuals with data for multiple legs of the same migration (n = 4). For this analysis, we included the latitude halfway between detections and number of days between detections, to see if pace varies by latitude and the length of time between detections. We also included the date of migration initiation to see if late departing birds compensate with a faster pace. To test whether the time of day that Wood Thrushes departed for migration differed between adults and juveniles, we fit generalized linear models with a Gamma error distribution and logarithmic link using age (adult or juvenile) as our predictor and included the covariates sex and year.  

Results

Fall migration initiation date and time of night

We deployed tags on 117 adults and 189 nestling Wood Thrushes, with 119 of these nestlings surviving both the fledgling and pre-migration period [28]. Of these birds, we detected 60/117 (51%) adults (19 male, 41 female) and 82/119 (69%) juveniles (43 male, 39 female) departing the study area as they initiated fall migration. The earliest migratory flight occurred on Aug 25, and the latest was October 15 with most departures occurring in mid to late September for both age classes (juveniles: Sept 19 ± 0.9 days; adults: Sept 28 ± 0.7 days). Juveniles departed significantly earlier than adults (t(139) = − 7.99, P < 0.001) and the effect size was 9 days (Fig. 2A). The three supported models (Table 1) were age + sex + year + age*sex (wi = 0.35), age + sex + age*sex (wi = 0.30), and age + sex (wi = 0.16). Age had a positive relationship with the migration departure date in the three supported models and the 95% confidence interval did not include zero (Table 2). Sex, year, and an interaction between sex and age also appeared in the supported models having a positive relationship with migration initiation date; however, the effect was weak because the 95% confidence intervals included zero.

Table 1 Models with ΔAICc < 2 that are at least 2 AICc better than the intercept-only model for each response variable of interest
Table 2 95% confidence intervals for averaged coefficient estimates appearing in models with ΔAICc < 2 that are at least 2 AICc better than the intercept-only model for each response variable of interest

We determined time of day for the initiation of migratory flight for 59 adults, and 82 juvenile birds. All Wood Thrushes initiated migratory flight between 1 and 288 min after sunset with the average being 84 ± 4 min after sunset. We found a significant difference in the time of day birds began migration based on their age (t(128) = 2.51, P = 0.01), with adults starting migration an average of 72 ± 4 min after sunset and juveniles starting migration an average of 93 ± 7 min after sunset (Fig. 2B). The four supported models (Table 1) were age (wi = 0.29), age + year (wi = 0.27), age + year + sex (wi = 0.16), and age + sex (wi = 0.14). Age had a negative relationship with timing of the initial migratory flight in the four supported models and the 95% confidence interval did not include zero (Table 2). Sex and year also had a negative relationship with the timing of the initial migratory flight, but in both cases the 95% confidence interval included zero.

First migratory flight speed and migration pace

After filtering all detections, we ended up with 16 juvenile and 11 adult Wood Thrushes that were detected on both sides of Lake Erie with clear peaks in signal strength at both towers. Calculated flight speed of birds crossing the lake varied from 16.3 to 70.2 km/h and the average flight speed was 42.7 ± 2.9 km/h. When not accounting for other variables, we found a significant difference in the flight speed of adult and juvenile birds (t(25) = − 2.76, P = 0.003), with juveniles (37.1 ± 3.9 km/h) averaging about 25% slower than adults (51.0 ± 3.1 km/h; Fig. 2C). However, adults had a stronger tailwind component than juveniles (Fig. 3A) and thus in the overall model, age class was not a strong predictor of flight speed (Table 1). The three supported models (Table 1) were tailwind + year (wi = 0.33), tailwind (wi = 0.17), and tailwind + age (wi = 0.16). Age class appeared in the supported models with a positive relationship with flight speed, but the 95% confidence interval included zero indicating a weak relationship (Table 2). The tailwind component had a positive relationship with flight speed (Fig. 3B) and was the only covariate with a 95% confidence interval that did not include zero (Table 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

During 2016–2019 fall migration in Norfolk County, Ontario, adults averaged a greater wind advantage during their flights across Lake Erie than juveniles (A). The advantage gained from tailwind was closely linked to flight speed, and adults were more likely to initiate migration on nights with favorable wind conditions (B). The tailwind metric ranges between about 10 and −10 and indicates the relative advantage the wind gives a bird during flight. Wind speed and direction are used to calculate the tailwind metric, with a direct and strong tailwind producing higher positive scores and a direct and strong headwind producing lower negative scores

Despite the low Motus coverage across the interior eastern U.S., we were able to determine the speed of 31 different sections (the linear distance between two towers that captured consecutive detections of the same bird) of migration by 25 individual birds. Of these, 13 birds were juvenile (n = 18 sections), and 12 were adults (n = 13 sections). Migration pace varied from 9.8 to 101.9 km/day and the average pace was 57.4 ± 4.1 km/day. Migration pace differed significantly by age (t(29) = − 3.49, P = 0.002), with juvenile birds (47.3 ± 5.1 km/day) averaging a 34% slower pace than adults (71.6 ± 4.7 km/day; Fig. 2D). The two supported models (Table 1) were age + sex + year + latitude (wi = 0.28), and age + sex + year + latitude + distance (wi = 0.18). Age appeared in both models having a positive relationship and a 95% confidence interval that narrowly included zero (Table 2). Sex and departure date were positively related to migration pace and had 95% confidence intervals that included zero. Latitude had a negative relationship with migration pace, with pace increasing farther south, and the 95% confidence interval did not include zero.

Discussion

We used Motus to measure and compare different migration parameters of juvenile and adult Wood Thrushes departing from a breeding site, giving us the unique opportunity to test predictions based on different age classes starting migration from the same location. We found that adults departed on fall migration at a later date, sooner after sunset, and had a faster migration pace through the United States. We also found that adults crossed Lake Erie faster during their initial migratory flight, but the speed and direction of tailwind on the night of departure was the strongest contributing factor.

Migration timing

Although many studies have tested for age differences in migration timing at stopover sites (e.g. Carlisle et al. [14]), few have tested for differences in the initial onset of fall migration. We found that juvenile Wood Thrushes initiated fall migration at a significantly earlier date than adults, by 9 days on average. Savannah Sparrow juveniles started their fall migration 3–4 weeks earlier than adults [20, 31] but juvenile Cyprus Wheatears (Oenanthe cypriaca) depart their natal site on fall migration 5 days later than adult breeders [50]. The later start of adult migration in some species may be due to time/energy constraints arising from the timing of feather molt, breeding, and parental care (e.g. Mitchell et al. [42]). At migratory stopover sites, a strong pattern across passerine species is that juvenile fall migration precedes that of adults if adults undergo extensive feather molt prior to migration whereas juveniles migrate later than adults for species in which adults undergo molt during or after migration (e.g. Carlisle et al. [14]). The Wood Thrush fits this pattern since adults molt ~ 90% of their flight feathers at the breeding site prior to migration [25] and late breeding adults delay molt and fall migration presumably to avoid overlap in these energetically costly activities [65]. Many other studies on migratory passerines have shown that within populations late breeding adults delay departure on fall migration [15, 20, 21, 33, 42]. Juvenile Wood Thrushes do not face as strong time constraints in part because they do not molt their flight feathers until the next year (e.g. Evans et al. [23]). However, Wood Thrushes that fledged very late in the season (late July–early August) began fall migration about 10 days later than the earliest fledged birds (mid-June, [28]). For late fledged juveniles, there may be a tradeoff between taking more time to prepare for their first migration (e.g., to be in better body condition) versus the costs of later departure (e.g., decreasing temperature and food resources; Mitchell et al. [42]).

Initiating migratory flights soon after sunset is thought to be a strategy that maximizes the potential for long distance nocturnal flights [17, 47]. Later departure after sunset of juveniles versus adults is hypothesized to be due to their inexperience in using orientation cues and assessing favorable environmental conditions for long flights [57]. Juvenile Wood Thrushes departed on their first migration flight significantly later after sunset than adults, but only by 21 min on average (29% later). Few studies have tracked the time of night of the first fall migration flight of juvenile and adult passerines from the same breeding site [17]. For Kirtland’s Warbler (Setophaga kirtlandii) there was no significant difference in nocturnal departure time from the natal/breeding site for juveniles versus adults (both ~ 50 min after sunset [17]. It is unclear if the later nocturnal departure by juvenile Wood Thrushes is related to their inexperience and/or if juveniles have a shorter first migration flight than adults and so are not as time constrained. We also cannot confirm if this pattern continues after the first migratory flight, and whether the difference would be biologically meaningful during a long migration. Juveniles and adults crossed the ~ 60 km water barrier of Lake Erie on their first fall migration flight, but we do not know how much farther they travelled on that night or whether sunrise was the limiting factor of the flight duration.

Some passerines that have been tracked leaving their breeding/natal site undergo a period of short distance regional movements prior to onset of long-distance fall migration (Brown and Taylor [12], reviewed by Züst et al. [74]). For juveniles, these movements may function to increase access to food, to search for future breeding territories, to create a homing target for spring migration, and/or to train the stellar compass and orientation in preparation for migration (e.g. Mukhin et al. [46], Mitchell et al. [41]). Across passerines, these pre-migratory regional movements typically occur two hours later after sunset than migration departure flights perhaps because they are shorter distance than migration movements (e.g. Cooper et al. [17]). For our population of Wood Thrushes, adults rarely (8%) made regional movements before the onset of fall migration, but most juveniles (78%) made regional movements of up to 30 km away from the natal site [29]. Juvenile pre-migratory movements occurred primarily during the two weeks before fall migration departure, during the two hours prior to sunrise and were random in direction [29]. While most juveniles had gained experience travelling > 5 km in darkness prior to fall migration they may still have been inexperienced in orientating appropriately for longer distance southward migration. If later departure after sunset is due to inexperience, the age difference should diminish as the journey progresses. However, in the Northern Wheatear subspecies (Oenanthe oenanthe leucorhoa) that breeds in Canada, Greenland and Iceland, radio-tracking at an island stopover site in Germany showed that juveniles that were already > 800 km from natal sites (and so were experienced with long overwater flights) still departed at night about 80 min later than adults [57]. Further tracking studies from breeding sites are needed to understand the ecological factors, and biological significance, of age-related differences nocturnal departures on migration flights.

Flight speed and migration pace

On their first migratory flight, juvenile Wood Thrushes averaged 25% slower flight speed than adults, but this was due to adults using tailwind more so than juveniles. Tailwind was a strong predictor of flight speed, but age class was not. Similarly, in Savannah Sparrows slower inaugural migration flight in juveniles from an island was due to juveniles departing under less beneficial wind conditions [43]. Cyprus Wheatear fall migration starts with a very long (> 1000 km) non-stop flight, yet juvenile migration speed was not slower than adults perhaps because of the consistent availability of tailwinds [50]. Juveniles may learn to use tailwinds once fall migration is underway [57, 62]. Deppe et al. [22] used automated telemetry to track fall migration of individual Swainson’s and Wood Thrushes departing the U.S. Gulf coast and arriving in the Yucatan Peninsula after crossing across the Gulf of Mexico. Age class had no effect on individual departure decisions which were associated with passage of a cold front (providing tail winds) and high fat reserves, and juveniles did not take longer than adults to fly the ~ 1000 km non-stop journey which for Wood Thrushes lasted an average of 28 h.

We found that juvenile Wood Thrushes averaged a 34% slower pace than adults as they moved south through the eastern U.S. In our study population, juvenile fall migration occurs almost two months, on average, after young become independent of their parents [28]. While juveniles have much experience with foraging prior to fall migration, refueling at stopover sites may be more challenging because it requires physiological and behavioral changes to promote high food intake and fat storage and doing so at unfamiliar locations [38]. In Blackpoll Warblers (Setophaga striata) juveniles preceded adults by about one week at stopover sites in the western U.S. but this age pattern was reversed at eastern stopover sites presumably because juveniles migrate across North America more slowly than adults [45]. Juveniles are often hypothesized to face proximate constraints on migration pace due to their inexperience, such as inefficient foraging, which should be especially so during fall migration (reviewed by Woodrey [70]). Many studies have documented a lower body mass of juveniles than adults at stopover sites, which has been assumed to reflect differences in refueling ability (reviewed by Woodrey [70]). However, Jones et al. [34] examined passerine recaptures during fall stopover in southwestern Ontario to estimate rate of daily mass gain and found only 2 of 47 species had lower mass gain in juveniles than adults (89% of species had no significant age difference). Seewagen et al. [58] used plasma metabolite analysis to quantify refueling rate at a fall stopover site in New York and found no significant differences between juveniles and adults in both Neotropical migrants studied (Swainson’s Thrush and Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas). Although juveniles are relatively inexperienced, they have evolved a suite of physiological adaptations in response to the daunting energetic challenges of their first migration (e.g. McCabe and Guglielmo [38]). Juvenile passerines may be able refuel efficiently because they have larger digestive organs, higher metabolic rates, and higher rates of food intake compared with adults [38].

Fall migration pace is influenced by proximate factors along the journey, such as food supply and environmental conditions, but also by the longer-term selection pressures that influence migration strategy (e.g. Hedenstrom [3], Alerstam [30]). Selection pressures act on increasing immediate migration survival (e.g., time/energy optimization and predator avoidance) but may also occur through carry-over effects of migration pace on subsequent stages of the annual cycle (e.g. Marra et al. [40]). Many migratory passerines defend individual winter territories, and studies have shown that a high-quality winter territory can improve late-winter body condition, advance the timing of spring migration and increase reproductive success through early arrival on the breeding grounds (e.g. Norris et al. [48], Reudink et al. [54]). However, early spring arrival may not be as beneficial for juveniles because of the costs of competing with returning adults for breeding territories. McKinnon et al. [39] tracked spring migration of juvenile and adult Wood Thrushes from wintering sites in Belize and Costa Rica and found that the duration of spring migration of juveniles was 50% longer than adults even though juveniles took a similar route across the Gulf of Mexico. Juveniles made more frequent and shorter stopovers as they moved farther north through the U.S. which may be a stalling strategy rather than a pace imposed by flight inefficiency or slow refueling. For fall migration timing, it is unclear whether juveniles and adults face strong carryover effects that will influence their winter body condition or survival. We do not know if juvenile Wood Thrushes arrive on the wintering grounds later than adults or if this affects their access to high quality winter resources. We suspect not, because wintering juveniles do not consistently have lower body condition than adults [39, 64], the winter home ranges of juveniles do not contain a lower availability of food [64], and the timing of fall migration initiation in juveniles does not predict apparent annual survival [28]. Wood Thrushes also do not defend a fixed territory site throughout the wintering season and most individuals (~ 70%) move regionally (1–148 km away) long before spring migration begins [64].

Conclusions

The potential carry-over link between early fall migration departure and increased over-winter fitness is weakened by the discovery that many passerines have prolonged (> 7 d) fall stopovers, which are considered longer than necessary to refuel for migration [4]. Half of adult Wood Thrushes tracked with geolocators had prolonged stopovers on fall migration, and therefore the timing of fall migration through the southern U.S. did not predict arrival date on the wintering grounds [65]. Automated telemetry has confirmed that juveniles of some species (Blackpoll Warbler, Red-eyed Vireo) also have prolonged stopovers on fall migration [61]. A prolonged fall stopover can be associated with the need to cross large water bodies like the Gulf of Mexico but these also occur in other landscape contexts and so the fitness consequences are not well understood.

We found evidence that juvenile Wood Thrushes have an earlier and slower fall migration than adults. Juveniles departed at an earlier date, had a later nocturnal migration departure time from the natal/breeding site than adults, were less likely to use tailwinds on their first migration flight across a water barrier, and had a slower pace of fall migration through the eastern U.S. However, distinguishing between the proximate (e.g. wing length, experience, physiology) and ultimate (e.g. fitness benefits of earlier or faster fall migration) mechanisms causing these age-related patterns remains a challenge. More tracking studies from breeding sites are needed to understand the age-related differences in migration performance and we suggest comparing species with/without winter territories and with/without prolonged fall stopovers as a practical starting point.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used for analysis in this study have been uploaded to Dryad will be publicly available with a doi after review. Reviewers link: http://datadryad.org/stash/share/sLOL4mXxruXsinAr41y41is_-flkef3XtGuy8HFrACg.

References

  1. Akesson S, Bakam H, Hernandez EM, Ilieva M, Bianco G. Migratory orientation in inexperienced and experienced avian migrants. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2021;33(3):206–29. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/03949370.2021.1905076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Lundbkrg A. Why do young passerine birds have shorter wings than older birds? Ibis. 1984;126(3):410–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alerstam T. Optimal bird migration revisited. J Ornithol. 2011;152:5–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10336-011-0694-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arlt P, Olsson P, Fox JW, Low M, Pärt T. Prolonged stopover duration characterizes migration strategy and constraints of a long distance migrant songbird. Anim Migr. 2015;2:47–62. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1515/ami-2015-0002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold TW. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s Information Criterion. J Wildl Manag. 2010;2010(74):1175–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01236.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barton K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.17. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

  7. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bégin-Marchand C, Desrochers A, Taylor PD, Trembley JA, Berrigan L, Frei B, et al. Spatial structure in migration routes maintained despite regional convergence among eastern populations of Swainson’s Thrushes. Mov Ecol. 2021;9:23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-021-00263-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowlin MS, Enstrom DA, Murphy BJ, Plaza E, Jurich P, Cochran J. Unexplained altitude changes in a migrating thrush: long-flight altitude data from radio-telemetry. Auk. 2015;132(4):808–16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1642/AUK-15-33.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd BP, Hayes S, Israel AM, Stutchbury BJM. Breeding season forest fragment size does not create negative carry-over for adult Wood Thrushes on fall migration timing or apparent annual survival. Ornithol Appl. 2023;125(4):duad028. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ornithapp/duad028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bridge ES, Thorup K, Bowlin MS, Chilson PB, Diehl RH, Fleron RW, et al. Technology on the move: recent and forthcoming innovations for tracking migratory birds. BioSci. 2011;61:689–98. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1525/bio.2011.61.9.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown JM, Taylor PD. Adult and hatch-year blackpoll warblers exhibit radically different regional-scale movements during post-fledging dispersal. Biol Lett. 2015;11:20150593. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretical Approach. New York: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlisle JD, Kaltenecker GS, Swanson D. Stopover ecology of autumn landbird migrants in the Boise Foothills of southwestern Idaho. Condor. 2005;107:244. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1650/7808.10.1093/condor/107.2.244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chmura HE, Krause JS, Perez JH, Ramenofsky M, Wingfield JC. Autumn migratory departure is influenced by reproductive timing and weather in an Arctic passerine. J Ornithol. 2020;161:779–91. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10336-020-01754-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Collet L, Heim W. Differences in stopover duration and body mass change among Emberiza buntings during autumn migration in the Russian Far East. J Ornithol. 2022;163:779–89. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10336-022-01976-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper NW, Dossman BC, Berrigan LE, Brown JM, Brunner AR, Chmura HE, et al. Songbirds initiate migratory flights synchronously relative to civil dusk. Movement Ecol. 2023;11:24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-023-00382-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. COSEWIC. Assessment and status report on the Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, Canada; 2012.

  19. Crewe TL, Crysler Z, Taylor P. Motus R book: A walk through the use of R for Motus automated radio-telemetry data. 2018. https://motuswts.github.io/motus/articles/01-introduction.html

  20. Crysler ZJ, Ronconi RA, Taylor PD. Differential fall migratory routes of adult and juvenile Ipswitch Sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis princeps). Mov Ecol. 2016;4:3. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-016-0067-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. de Zwaan DR, Wilson S, Gow EA, Martin K. Sex-specific spatiotemporal variation and carry-over effects in a migratory alpine songbird. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:285. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fevo.2019.00285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deppe JL, Ward MP, Bolus RT, Diehl RH, Celis-Murillo A, Zenzal TJ Jr, et al. Fat, weather, and date affect migratory songbirds’ departure decisions, routes, and time it takes to cross the Gulf of Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(46):E6331–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.1503381112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Evans M, Elizabeth Gow RR, Roth MS, Johnson TJ, Underwood AF. Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina). In: Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG, Schulenberg TS, editors. Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology; 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2173/bow.woothr.01.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Gow EA, Done TW, Stutchbury BJM. Radio-tags have no behavioral or physiological effects on a migratory songbird during breeding and molt. J Field Ornithol. 2011;82:193–201. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2011.00333.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gow EA, Stutchbury BJM, Done T, Kyser TK. An examination of stable hydrogen isotope (δD) variation in adult and juvenile feathers from a migratory songbird. Can J Zool. 2012;90:585–94. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1139/z2012-024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gow EA, Stutchbury BJM. Within-season nesting dispersal and molt dispersal are linked to habitat shifts in a Neotropical migratory songbird. Wilson J Ornithol. 2013;125:696–708. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1676/13-015.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hartig, F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical regression models. R package version 0.4.6. 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa

  28. Hayes SM, Boyd BP, Israel AM, Stutchbury BJM. Natal forest fragment size does not predict fledgling, pre-migration or apparent annual survival in Wood Thrushes. Ornithol Appl. 2024;126(1):duad054. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ornithapp/duad054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayes S, Boyd BP, Stutchbury BJM. Why do juvenile Wood Thrushes make long-distance pre-migratory movements across a fragmented landscape? J Field Ornithol. 2024;95(2):9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5751/JFO-00465-950209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hedenstrom A. Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects. Philos R Trans Soc B. 2008;363:287–99. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rstb.2007.2140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Horn LC, vanVliet HEJ, Norris DR, Stutchbury BJM. Migratory behaviour of Ontario-breeding Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis) revealed by the Motus Wildlife Tracking System. Wilson J Ornithol. 2023;134(4):595–603. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1676/21-00040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hume ID, Biebach H. Digestive tract function in the long-distance migratory garden warbler. Sylvia borin J Comp Physiol B. 1996;166:388–95. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/BF02336922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Imlay TL, Mann HAR, Taylor PD. Autumn migratory timing and pace are driven by breeding season carryover effects. Anim Behav. 2021;177(7):207–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jones J, Francis CM, Drew M, Fuller S, Ng MWS. Age-related differences in body mass and rates of mass gain of passerines during autumn migratory stopover. Condor. 2002;104(1):49–58. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/condor/104.1.49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Justen JC, Easton WE, Delmore KE. Mapping seasonal migration in a songbird hybrid zone - heritability, genetic correlations, and genomic patterns linked to speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121(18):e2313442121. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.2313442121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kemp MU, Emiel van Loon E. RNCEP: global weather and climate data at your fingertips. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3(1):65–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00138.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Long Point Region Conservation Authority. Forest management plan 2020–2039. 2019. https://lprca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/LPRCA-FMP-FINAL_Public.pdf

  38. McCabe BJ, Guglielmo CG. Migration takes extra guts for juvenile songbirds: energetics and digestive physiology during the first journey. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McKinnon EA, Fraser KC, Stanley CQ, Stutchbury BJM. Tracking from the tropics reveals behaviour of juvenile songbirds on their first spring migration. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e105605. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0105605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Marra PP, Cohen EB, Loss SR, Rutter JE, Tonra CM. A call for full annual cycle research in animal ecology. Biol Lett. 2015;11:20150552. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mitchell GW, Taylor PD, Warkentin IG. Assessing the function of broad-scale movements made by juvenile songbirds prior to migration. Condor. 2010;112(4):644–54. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1525/cond.2010.090136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mitchell GW, Newman AEM, Wikelski M, Norris DR. Timing of breeding carries over to influence migratory departure in a songbird: an automated radiotracking study. J Anim Ecol. 2012;81:1024–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01978.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mitchell GW, Woodworth BK, Taylor PD, Norris DR. Automated telemetry reveals age specific differences in flight duration and speed are driven by wind conditions in a migratory songbird. Mov Ecol. 2015;3:15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-015-0046-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Morbey YE, Guglielmo CG, Taylor PD, Maggini I, Deakin J, Mackenzie SA, et al. Evaluation of sex differences in the stopover behavior and postdeparture movements of wood-warblers. Behav Ecol. 2018;29(1):117–27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/beheco/arx123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Morris SR, Covino KM, Jacobs JD, Taylor PD. Fall migratory patterns of the Blackpoll Warbler at a continental scale. Auk. 2016;133(1):41–51. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1642/AUK-15-133.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mukhin A, Kosarev V, Ktitorov P. Nocturnal life of young songbirds well before migration. Proc R Soc B. 2005;272:1535–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rspb.2005.3120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Müller F, Taylor PD, Sjöberg S, Muheim R, Tsvey A, Mackenzie SA, et al. Towards a conceptual framework for explaining variation in nocturnal departure time of songbird migrants. Mov Ecol. 2016;4:1–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-016-0089-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Norris DR, Marra PP, Kyser TK, Sherry TW, Ratcliffe LM. Tropical winter habitat limits reproductive success on the temperate breeding grounds in a migratory bird. Proc R Soc B. 2004;271:59–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rspb.2003.2569.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ozarowska A, Zaniewicz G, Meissner W. Sex and age-specific differences in wing pointedness and wing length in blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla migrating through the southern Baltic coast. Curr Zool. 2021;67(3):271–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/cz/zoaa065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Patchett R, Kirschel ANG, Robins King J, Styles P, Cresswell W. Age-related changes in migratory behaviour within the first annual cycle of a passerine bird. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(10):e0273686. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0273686.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Pyle P. Identification Guide to North American Birds, Part 1: Columbidae to Ploceidae. Bolinas: Slate Creek Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  52. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020. https://www.R-project.org/

  53. Rappole JH, Tipton AR. New harness design for attachment of radio transmitters to small passerines. J Field Ornithol. 1991;62:335–7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Reudink MW, Marra PP, Kyser TK, Boag PT, Langin KM, Ratcliffe LM. Non-breeding season events influence sexual selection in a long-distance migratory bird. Proc R Soc B. 2009;276(1662):1619–26. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rspb.2008.1452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Rguibi-Idrissi H, Julliard R, Barlein F. Variation in the stopover duration of Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus in Morocco: effects of season, age and site. Ibis. 2003;145:650–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1046/j.1474-919X.2003.00208.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Safi K, Kranstauber B, Weinzierl R, Griffin L, Rees EC, Cabot D, et al. Flying with the wind: scale dependency of speed and direction measurements in modelling wind support in avian flight. Mov Ecol. 2013;1:4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/2051-3933-1-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Schmaljohann H, Muller F, Klinner T, Eikenaar C. Potential age differences in the migratory behaviour of a nocturnal songbird migrant during autumn and spring. J Avian Biol. 2018;49:e01815. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jav.01815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Seewagen CL, Guglielmo CG, Morbey YE. Stopover refueling rate underlies protandry and seasonal variation in migration timing of songbirds. Behav Ecol. 2013;24(3):634–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/beheco/ars225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sergio F, Tanferna A, De Stephanis R, Jimenez LL, Blas J, Tavecchia G, et al. Individual improvements and selective mortality shape lifelong migratory performance. Nature. 2014;515:410–3. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nature13696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sillett TS, Holmes RT. Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J Anim Ecol. 2002;71(2):296–308. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00599.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Smetzer JR, King DI. Prolonged stopover and consequences of migratory strategy on local-scale movements within a regional songbird staging area. Auk. 2015;135(3):547–60. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1642/AUK-18-4.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Smolinsky JA, Diehl RH, Radzio TA, Delaney DK, Moore FR. Factors influencing the movement biology of migrant songbirds confronted with an ecological barrier. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67(12):2041–51. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00265-013-1614-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Stanley CQ, McKinnon EA, Fraser KC, Macpherson MP, Casbourn G, Friesen L, et al. Connectivity of wood thrush breeding, wintering, and migration sites based on range-wide tracking. Conserv Biol. 2015;29:164–74. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/cobi.12352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Stanley CQ, Dudash MR, Ryder TB, Gregory Shriver W, Marra PP. Variable tropical moisture and food availability underlie mixed winter space-use strategies in a migratory songbird. Proc Royal Soc B: Biol Sci. 2021;288(1955):20211220. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rspb.2021.1220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Stutchbury BJM, Gow EA, Done T, MacPherson M, Fox JW, Afanasyev V. Effects of post-breeding molt and energetic condition on timing of songbird migration into the tropics. Proc R Soc B. 2011;278(1702):131–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rspb.2010.1220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Stutchbury BJM, Tarof SA, Done T, Gow EA, Kramer PM, Tautin J, et al. Tracking long-distance songbird migration by using geolocators. Science. 2009;323:896. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/science.1166664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Taylor CM, Stutchbury BJM. A network approach to model the effects of breeding versus winter habitat loss and fragmentation on the population dynamics of a migratory songbird. Ecol Appl. 2016;26:424–37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1890/14-1410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Taylor PD, Crewe TL, Mackenzie SA, Lepage D, Aubry Y, Crysler Z, et al. The motus wildlife tracking system: a collaborative research network to enhance the understanding of wildlife movement. Avian Conserv Ecol. 2017;12:8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5751/ace-00953-120208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Thorup K, et al. Evidence for a navigational map stretching across the continental US in a migratory songbird. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2007;104(46):18115–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Woodrey MS. Age-dependent aspects of stopover biology of passerines birds. Stud Avian Biol. 2000;20:43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Wikelski M, Tarlow EM, Raim A, Diehl RH, Larkin RP, Visser GH. Costs of migration in free-flying songbirds. Nature. 2003;423(704):423704a. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/423704a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Yong W, Finch DM, Moore FR, Kelly JF. Stopover ecology and habitat use of migratory Wilson’s warblers. Auk. 1998;115(4):829–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2307/4089502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Züst Z, Mukhin A, Taylor PD, Schmaljohan H. Pre-migratory flights in migrant songbirds: the ecological and evolutionary importance of understudied exploratory movements. Mov Ecol. 2023;11:78. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-023-00440-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nature Conservancy Canada, Long Point Basin Land Trust, Long Point Region Conservation Authority, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, and the private landowners of Norfolk County for permitting us to conduct research on their land. We thank Alexandra Israel and Amy Wilson for their help with data collection in the field. For assistance with the Motus Wildlife Tracking System, we thank Stuart Mackenzie, Tara Crewe, and Zoe Crysler.

Funding

This project was funded by B.J.M.S.’s Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (grant number: RGPIN-2016-05344) Discovery Grant and NSERC Research Tools and Instruments Grant, The Schad Foundation, and York University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.P.B. and B.J.M.S. formulated the questions. B.P.B., B.J.M.S., and S.M.H. designed the study. B.P.B and S.M.H. processed the detection data. B.P.B. and A.A.M. conducted the analysis. B.P.B. and B.J.M.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan P. Boyd.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The methods used in this study were approved by York University’s Animal Care Committee and permits for tagging Wood Thrushes were issued by Canadian Wildlife Service’s Bird Banding Office.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyd, B.P., Hayes, S.M., Migotto, A.A. et al. Age-related differences in fall migration timing and performance of juvenile and adult Wood Thrushes departing from a breeding site. Mov Ecol 13, 32 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-025-00556-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40462-025-00556-3

Keywords