Offshore vagrancy in passerines is predicted by season, wind-drift, and species characteristics

Table 2 Candidate species models ranked by AICc value

Model names	K		Delta_AICc	ModelLik	AICcWt	LL	Cum.Wt
ForStrat.understory + Hand_wing * Migration_dist	6	138.17	0	1	0.46	− 62.29	0.46
ForStrat.understory	3	140.49	2.32	0.31	0.14	− 67.03	0.61
Hand_wing * Migration_dist	5	140.88	2.71	0.26	0.12	− 64.88	0.73
ForStrat.midhigh + Hand_wing * Migration_dist	6	142.51	4.34	0.11	0.05	− 64.46	0.78
mass + Hand_wing * Migration_dist	6	143.31	5.14	0.08	0.04	− 64.86	0.81
ForStrat.aerial + Hand_wing * Migration_dist	6	143.33	5.16	0.08	0.03	− 64.87	0.85
ForStrat.canopy + Hand_wing * Migration_dist	6	143.35	5.18	0.08	0.03	− 64.88	0.88
Null	2	143.83	5.66	0.06	0.03	− 69.81	0.91
Migration_dist	3	143.90	5.73	0.06	0.03	− 68.73	0.94
ForStrat.canopy	3	145.34	7.17	0.03	0.01	− 69.46	0.95
ForStrat.midhigh	3	145.60	7.43	0.02	0.01	− 69.59	0.96
Hand_wing	3	145.74	7.57	0.02	0.01	− 69.66	0.97
mass	3	145.91	7.74	0.02	0.01	− 69.74	0.98
ForStrat.aerial	3	146.00	7.83	0.02	0.01	− 69.79	0.99
Hand_wing + Migration_dist	4	146.19	8.02	0.02	0.01	− 68.73	1

All predictor combinations were chosen a priori to test specific vagrancy hypotheses. The best model had a lower AICc value by over 2 values

ISSN: 2051-3933